Best Known (227−69, 227, s)-Nets in Base 2
(227−69, 227, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 227, 112)-net over F2, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 250, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
(227−69, 227, 193)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (158, 227, 193)-net over F2, using
(227−69, 227, 1306)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 227, 1307)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (158, 226, 1307)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 108 096031 469268 870051 246539 120070 405121 174922 852884 077092 780341 294056 > 2226 [i]