Best Known (216−70, 216, s)-Nets in Base 2
(216−70, 216, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (146, 216, 112)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 113, 56)-net over F4, using
(216−70, 216, 159)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (146, 216, 159)-net over F2, using
(216−70, 216, 951)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (146, 216, 952)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 106724 045667 427286 017163 363581 313126 116786 419183 429994 997869 534255 > 2216 [i]