Best Known (229−71, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−71, 229, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 229, 112)-net over F2, using
- 21 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 250, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
(229−71, 229, 185)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (158, 229, 185)-net over F2, using
(229−71, 229, 1220)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 229, 1221)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (158, 228, 1221)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 439 932863 451167 786686 067051 342205 938183 677046 202709 006084 228250 111680 > 2228 [i]