Best Known (226−72, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(226−72, 226, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (154, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- 16 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (154, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 121, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 121, 56)-net over F4, using
(226−72, 226, 172)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (154, 226, 172)-net over F2, using
(226−72, 226, 1055)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (154, 226, 1056)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 109 094356 094406 759375 194568 467713 358182 172790 480403 502924 403898 956064 > 2226 [i]