Best Known (214−73, 214, s)-Nets in Base 2
(214−73, 214, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 214, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 216, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 108, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 108, 56)-net over F4, using
(214−73, 214, 140)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (141, 214, 140)-net over F2, using
(214−73, 214, 810)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 214, 811)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 213, 811)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13379 094557 625945 349498 991471 695099 638294 188399 086263 734658 990994 > 2213 [i]