Best Known (226−74, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(226−74, 226, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- 12 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (152, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
(226−74, 226, 162)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (152, 226, 162)-net over F2, using
(226−74, 226, 957)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 226, 958)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 111 610366 779059 308918 766621 804175 077909 081034 408434 218736 635076 544015 > 2226 [i]