Best Known (242−74, 242, s)-Nets in Base 2
(242−74, 242, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(242−74, 242, 200)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 242, 200)-net over F2, using
(242−74, 242, 1309)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 242, 1310)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 070702 223999 881337 739634 776218 216292 912751 490450 467698 059107 352267 136872 > 2242 [i]