Best Known (233−78, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2
(233−78, 233, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (155, 233, 112)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (155, 244, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 122, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 122, 56)-net over F4, using
(233−78, 233, 158)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (155, 233, 158)-net over F2, using
(233−78, 233, 911)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (155, 233, 912)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14047 248308 846002 769191 935722 348492 228095 075614 950848 336099 918505 749252 > 2233 [i]