Best Known (256−78, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(256−78, 256, 132)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (178, 256, 132)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (178, 258, 132)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 129, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 129, 66)-net over F4, using
(256−78, 256, 212)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (178, 256, 212)-net over F2, using
(256−78, 256, 1399)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (178, 256, 1400)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116123 721930 855960 238483 741091 329701 336491 489388 010081 311140 593415 845379 440827 > 2256 [i]