Best Known (226−79, 226, s)-Nets in Base 2
(226−79, 226, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (147, 226, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (147, 228, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 114, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 114, 56)-net over F4, using
(226−79, 226, 139)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (147, 226, 139)-net over F2, using
(226−79, 226, 783)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (147, 226, 784)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (147, 225, 784)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55 209425 140765 058775 528682 880628 530913 060639 850567 508354 623648 296808 > 2225 [i]