Best Known (232−79, 232, s)-Nets in Base 2
(232−79, 232, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (153, 232, 112)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (153, 240, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 120, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 120, 56)-net over F4, using
(232−79, 232, 151)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (153, 232, 151)-net over F2, using
(232−79, 232, 877)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (153, 232, 878)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (153, 231, 878)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3477 689996 806712 865316 502902 743693 034017 235626 850738 165179 840023 344032 > 2231 [i]