Best Known (259−79, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−79, 259, 132)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (180, 259, 132)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (179, 259, 132)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (179, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
(259−79, 259, 214)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (180, 259, 214)-net over F2, using
(259−79, 259, 1452)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (180, 259, 1453)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (180, 258, 1453)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 468287 963657 616606 961432 130500 235622 871649 182286 053971 115689 460591 968573 617640 > 2258 [i]