Best Known (260−79, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−79, 260, 132)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (181, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (179, 260, 132)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- T6 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 49 and N(F) ≥ 66, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (49, 65)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (49, 130, 66)-net over F4, using
(260−79, 260, 217)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (181, 260, 217)-net over F2, using
(260−79, 260, 1479)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (181, 260, 1480)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (181, 259, 1480)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 935152 507916 704244 965292 895026 227612 074056 214955 536569 978394 694930 242301 153494 > 2259 [i]