Best Known (99, 99+8, s)-Nets in Base 2
(99, 99+8, 2097299)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (99, 107, 2097299)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 2097299, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(2097299, 8), 16778285, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 2097299, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097299, 7), 14680986, 9]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(149, 7), 1028, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(149, 4), 581, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(149, 3), 432, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (11, 15, 149)-net over F2, using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(149, 3), 432, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(149, 4), 581, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(292, 2097150, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097150, 7), 14679958, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388600, F2, 8) (dual of [8388600, 8388508, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388607 = 223−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388600, F2, 8) (dual of [8388600, 8388508, 9]-code), using
- linear OOA(215, 149, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(149, 7), 1028, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 2097299, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097299, 7), 14680986, 9]-NRT-code), using
(99, 99+8, 4194452)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (99, 107, 4194452)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 4194452, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(4194452, 8), 33555509, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 4194452, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(4194452, 7), 29361057, 9]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 4194452, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194452, 2), 8388797, 9]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(215, 151, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(151, 2), 287, 5]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(215, 151, F2, 4) (dual of [151, 136, 5]-code), using
- a “GB†code from Brouwer’s database [i]
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OA(215, 151, F2, 4) (dual of [151, 136, 5]-code), using
- linear OOA(292, 4194301, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388510, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388602, F2, 8) (dual of [8388602, 8388510, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388607 = 223−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388602, F2, 8) (dual of [8388602, 8388510, 9]-code), using
- linear OOA(215, 151, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(151, 2), 287, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 4194452, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194452, 2), 8388797, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2107, 4194452, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(4194452, 7), 29361057, 9]-NRT-code), using
(99, 99+8, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (99, 107, large)-net in base 2, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (99, 101, large)-net in base 2, but