Best Known (209−81, 209, s)-Nets in Base 2
(209−81, 209, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (128, 209, 68)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (128, 214, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 107, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 107, 34)-net over F4, using
(209−81, 209, 103)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (128, 209, 103)-net over F2, using
(209−81, 209, 522)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (128, 209, 523)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (128, 208, 523)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 417 944785 633218 537468 242708 411173 207414 684354 325461 776076 649712 > 2208 [i]