Best Known (173, 173+81, s)-Nets in Base 2
(173, 173+81, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (173, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+81, 190)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (173, 254, 190)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+81, 1205)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (173, 254, 1206)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (173, 253, 1206)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 14509 631562 688895 855491 581738 261340 665121 652748 704627 367054 487760 712846 649470 > 2253 [i]