Best Known (235−83, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(235−83, 235, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (152, 235, 112)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (152, 238, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 119, 56)-net over F4, using
(235−83, 235, 140)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (152, 235, 140)-net over F2, using
(235−83, 235, 784)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (152, 235, 785)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (152, 234, 785)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28630 514605 514813 773109 962098 829893 008631 389201 227692 489679 861203 740000 > 2234 [i]