Best Known (245−83, 245, s)-Nets in Base 2
(245−83, 245, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 245, 112)-net over F2, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(245−83, 245, 160)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 245, 160)-net over F2, using
(245−83, 245, 939)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 245, 940)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 244, 940)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29 105760 082069 667654 856200 022226 997380 854207 918451 809416 891721 048239 475237 > 2244 [i]