Best Known (174, 174+83, s)-Nets in Base 2
(174, 174+83, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (174, 257, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 257, 112)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(174, 174+83, 186)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (174, 257, 186)-net over F2, using
(174, 174+83, 1163)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (174, 257, 1164)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (174, 256, 1164)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 117332 338995 575069 367808 269450 313802 188263 146787 883163 574305 509546 103691 158700 > 2256 [i]