Best Known (215−85, 215, s)-Nets in Base 2
(215−85, 215, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 215, 68)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 218, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 109, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 109, 34)-net over F4, using
(215−85, 215, 101)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 215, 101)-net over F2, using
(215−85, 215, 504)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 215, 505)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 214, 505)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26464 154424 881545 389620 051453 994958 097115 763495 421201 674587 407396 > 2214 [i]