Best Known (260−85, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−85, 260, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (175, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
(260−85, 260, 183)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (175, 260, 183)-net over F2, using
(260−85, 260, 1125)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (175, 260, 1126)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (175, 259, 1126)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 954491 199755 397291 289326 225579 662475 449513 919574 563871 832559 513289 674707 732944 > 2259 [i]