Best Known (173, 173+85, s)-Nets in Base 2
(173, 173+85, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (173, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+85, 179)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (173, 258, 179)-net over F2, using
(173, 173+85, 1086)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (173, 258, 1087)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (173, 257, 1087)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 234234 515339 996158 379723 271261 386002 589954 757489 536964 667804 049009 726826 870285 > 2257 [i]