Best Known (162, 162+86, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 162+86, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 248, 112)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(162, 162+86, 153)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 248, 153)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+86, 857)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 248, 858)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 459 664702 920486 881352 157799 704095 244066 932680 812076 497208 544956 604834 170280 > 2248 [i]