MinT - Best Known (228−87, 228, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (228−87, 228, s)-Nets in Base 2

(228−87, 228, 76)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (141, 228, 76)-net over F₂, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (39, 82, 33)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
2. digital (59, 146, 43)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 54, N(F)Â =Â 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(228−87, 228, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive

(141, 228, 84)-net in base 2, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 114, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(228−87, 228, 115)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (141, 228, 115)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(228−87, 228, 594)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (141, 228, 595)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 227, 595)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 225 889574 253194 045590 614201 275804 315376 681879 251603 785221 324722 644920 > 2²²⁷ [i]