Best Known (250−87, 250, s)-Nets in Base 2
(250−87, 250, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (163, 250, 112)-net over F2, using
- 10 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
(250−87, 250, 153)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (163, 250, 153)-net over F2, using
(250−87, 250, 872)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (163, 250, 873)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (163, 249, 873)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 922 696969 575025 665566 856444 189873 988944 516159 591503 652016 545798 436393 961048 > 2249 [i]