Best Known (171, 171+87, s)-Nets in Base 2
(171, 171+87, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(171, 171+87, 169)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 258, 169)-net over F2, using
(171, 171+87, 1000)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 258, 1001)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (171, 257, 1001)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 231681 648093 378159 578986 663681 090403 716218 339970 498948 335270 637955 702530 045368 > 2257 [i]