Best Known (251−89, 251, s)-Nets in Base 2
(251−89, 251, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 251, 112)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(251−89, 251, 147)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 251, 147)-net over F2, using
(251−89, 251, 822)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 251, 823)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (162, 250, 823)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1863 939713 975553 033638 453301 558302 615675 893981 013556 509074 990594 881131 886066 > 2250 [i]