Best Known (142, 142+89, s)-Nets in Base 2
(142, 142+89, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 231, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (59, 148, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
(142, 142+89, 114)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (142, 231, 114)-net over F2, using
(142, 142+89, 583)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 231, 584)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (142, 230, 584)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1753 937212 887601 817423 541069 016819 911942 908721 189889 420178 786009 588040 > 2230 [i]