Best Known (139−9, 139, s)-Nets in Base 2
(139−9, 139, 4196350)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 139, 4196350)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2139, 4196350, F2, 9, 9) (dual of [(4196350, 9), 37767011, 10]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2139, 4196350, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4196350, 8), 33570661, 10]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(2049, 8), 16369, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 4 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(2049, 4), 8173, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(2049, 3), 6124, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (19, 23, 2049)-net over F2, using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(2049, 3), 6124, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 4 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(2049, 4), 8173, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2116, 4194301, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4194301, 8), 33554292, 10]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2116, large, F2, 2, 9), using
- linear OOA(223, 2049, F2, 8, 4) (dual of [(2049, 8), 16369, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2139, 4196350, F2, 8, 9) (dual of [(4196350, 8), 33570661, 10]-NRT-code), using
(139−9, 139, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 139, large)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (130, 140, large)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 10), using
(139−9, 139, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 139, large)-net in base 2, because
- 7 times m-reduction [i] would yield (130, 132, large)-net in base 2, but