Best Known (9, 9+9, s)-Nets in Base 2
(9, 9+9, 20)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (9, 18, 20)-net over F2, using
(9, 9+9, 27)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (9, 18, 28)-net over F2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield digital (9, 17, 28)-net over F2, but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(217, 28, F2, 8) (dual of [28, 11, 9]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(218, 29, F2, 9) (dual of [29, 11, 10]-code), but
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(217, 28, F2, 8) (dual of [28, 11, 9]-code), but
(9, 9+9, 34)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (9, 18, 35)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(218, 35, S2, 2, 9), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 4 415953 315895 784996 821323 246350 813671 372880 963446 730828 816384 / 16 236389 973973 339032 691828 244417 017864 713945 084685 578181 > 218 [i]