Best Known (232−90, 232, s)-Nets in Base 2
(232−90, 232, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (142, 232, 75)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 240, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 152, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 88, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(232−90, 232, 112)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (142, 232, 112)-net over F2, using
(232−90, 232, 564)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (142, 232, 565)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7223 227421 885250 499429 995387 815326 015053 341915 135197 449730 705756 452556 > 2232 [i]