Best Known (162, 162+90, s)-Nets in Base 2
(162, 162+90, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 252, 112)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(162, 162+90, 145)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 252, 145)-net over F2, using
(162, 162+90, 790)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 252, 791)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7525 726420 984755 940269 927937 387059 347882 747390 983676 484965 438413 021860 905536 > 2252 [i]