Best Known (164, 164+92, s)-Nets in Base 2
(164, 164+92, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 256, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 256, 112)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+92, 145)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (164, 256, 145)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+92, 786)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 256, 787)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 121646 007447 494718 548930 940120 809760 427677 275525 259021 285871 689933 537266 575136 > 2256 [i]