Best Known (256−94, 256, s)-Nets in Base 2
(256−94, 256, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (162, 256, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (162, 258, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 129, 56)-net over F4, using
(256−94, 256, 138)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (162, 256, 138)-net over F2, using
(256−94, 256, 733)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (162, 256, 734)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 116513 070425 387638 318244 732279 020647 845664 018456 672170 074719 194034 729160 003912 > 2256 [i]