Best Known (132−95, 132, s)-Nets in Base 2
(132−95, 132, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (37, 132, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 132, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(132−95, 132, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (37, 132, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 132, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(132−95, 132, 57)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (37, 132, 58)-net in base 2, because
- 22 times m-reduction [i] would yield (37, 110, 58)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2110, 58, S2, 2, 73), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 62307 562302 417931 542365 955950 641152 / 37 > 2110 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2110, 58, S2, 2, 73), but