Best Known (144, 144+97, s)-Nets in Base 2
(144, 144+97, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (144, 241, 75)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (144, 246, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 90, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 156, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 90, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(144, 144+97, 107)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (144, 241, 107)-net over F2, using
(144, 144+97, 531)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (144, 241, 532)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (144, 240, 532)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 785118 918408 658125 709489 662472 321625 316060 482517 841864 559446 783686 527120 > 2240 [i]