MinT - Best Known (233−99, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (233−99, 233, s)-Nets in Base 2

(233−99, 233, 67)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (134, 233, 67)-net over F₂, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (134, 234, 67)-net over F₂, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (39, 89, 33)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (45, 145, 34)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 41, N(F)Â =Â 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(233−99, 233, 92)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (134, 233, 92)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(233−99, 233, 440)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (134, 233, 441)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (134, 232, 441)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 7387 041586 911463 322763 278852 051479 081690 635204 973424 344558 608565 991478 > 2²³² [i]