Best Known (44, 44+∞, s)-Nets in Base 2
(44, 44+∞, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, m, 33)-net over F2 for arbitrarily large m, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (44, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(44, 44+∞, 34)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (44, m, 34)-net over F2 for arbitrarily large m, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (44, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
(44, 44+∞, 52)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, m, 53)-net in base 2 for arbitrarily large m, because
- m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 310, 53)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2310, 53, S2, 6, 266), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 208592 483976 651375 233888 838493 120323 691670 363511 391872 065140 782013 888645 095765 678713 179891 302400 / 89 > 2310 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2310, 53, S2, 6, 266), but