Best Known (85, 134, s)-Nets in Base 2
(85, 134, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (85, 134, 66)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (85, 140, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 70, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 70, 33)-net over F4, using
(85, 134, 82)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (85, 134, 82)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (18, 67, 41)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 18 and N(F) ≥ 41, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (18, 40)-sequence over F4, using
(85, 134, 422)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (85, 134, 423)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (85, 133, 423)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11271 913406 771145 448422 496433 012124 484964 > 2133 [i]