Best Known (86, 137, s)-Nets in Base 2
(86, 137, 66)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (86, 137, 66)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 142, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 71, 33)-net over F4, using
(86, 137, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (86, 137, 80)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (86, 138, 80)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 69, 40)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 17 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (17, 39)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (17, 69, 40)-net over F4, using
(86, 137, 406)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (86, 137, 407)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (86, 136, 407)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 91387 780079 405481 525602 236251 872388 986208 > 2136 [i]