Best Known (111, 142, s)-Nets in Base 2
(111, 142, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (111, 142, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (110, 142, 195)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (110, 144, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 48, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 48, 65)-net over F8, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (110, 144, 195)-net over F2, using
(111, 142, 306)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (111, 142, 306)-net over F2, using
(111, 142, 4317)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (111, 142, 4318)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (111, 141, 4318)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 791069 744001 499270 841142 670272 250097 271308 > 2141 [i]