Best Known (95, 143, s)-Nets in Base 2
(95, 143, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (95, 143, 68)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (95, 148, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 74, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 74, 34)-net over F4, using
(95, 143, 104)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (95, 143, 104)-net over F2, using
(95, 143, 574)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (95, 143, 575)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11 172113 971430 220579 902212 069879 938593 998261 > 2143 [i]