Best Known (102, 147, s)-Nets in Base 2
(102, 147, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (102, 147, 75)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (4, 49, 25)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 24)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 24)-sequence over F8, using
(102, 147, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(102, 147, 84)-net in base 2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on (102, 150, 84)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 75, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 75, 42)-net in base 4, using
(102, 147, 132)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (102, 147, 132)-net over F2, using
(102, 147, 868)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (102, 147, 869)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (102, 146, 869)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 89 726979 055536 369428 976703 222594 527710 664168 > 2146 [i]