MinT - Best Known (101, 148, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (101, 148, s)-Nets in Base 2

(101, 148, 71)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (101, 148, 71)-net over F₂, using

(u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
1. digital (1, 24, 5)-net over F₂, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence (PirÅ¡iÄ‡ implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
2. digital (77, 124, 66)-net over F₂, using
  - trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 62, 33)-net over F₄, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F₄, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(101, 148, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive

(101, 148, 84)-net in base 2, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 74, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(101, 148, 122)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (101, 148, 122)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(101, 148, 758)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (101, 148, 759)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (101, 147, 759)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 183 061230 082145 339594 834729 146729 561181 249594 > 2¹⁴⁷ [i]