Best Known (141, 149, s)-Nets in Base 2
(141, 149, 4325372)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (141, 149, 4325372)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2149, 4325372, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(4325372, 8), 34602827, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2149, 4325372, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(4325372, 7), 30277455, 9]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(131071, 7), 917463, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(131071, 4), 524250, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(131071, 3), 393179, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (30, 34, 131071)-net over F2, using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(131071, 3), 393179, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(131071, 4), 524250, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(2115, 4194301, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(4194301, 7), 29359992, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding and stacking with additional row [i] based on linear OOA(2115, large, F2, 2, 8), using
- linear OOA(234, 131071, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(131071, 7), 917463, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2149, 4325372, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(4325372, 7), 30277455, 9]-NRT-code), using
(141, 149, large)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (141, 149, large)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (141, 152, large)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2152, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- 4 times NRT-code embedding in larger space [i] based on linear OOA(2140, large, F2, 3, 11), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2152, large, F2, 3, 11), using
(141, 149, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (141, 149, large)-net in base 2, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (141, 143, large)-net in base 2, but