Best Known (131, 161, s)-Nets in Base 2
(131, 161, 266)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (131, 161, 266)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (2, 17, 6)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 6, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (2, 5)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (114, 144, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (2, 17, 6)-net over F2, using
(131, 161, 557)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (131, 161, 557)-net over F2, using
(131, 161, 10913)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (131, 161, 10914)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 926617 591090 010773 606415 666208 331766 749542 522608 > 2161 [i]