Best Known (126, 163, s)-Nets in Base 2
(126, 163, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (126, 163, 195)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (126, 168, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 56, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 56, 65)-net over F8, using
(126, 163, 305)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (126, 163, 305)-net over F2, using
(126, 163, 3840)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (126, 163, 3841)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (126, 162, 3841)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 851112 861027 543280 731658 202164 392290 252677 264064 > 2162 [i]