Best Known (113, 166, s)-Nets in Base 2
(113, 166, 74)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (113, 166, 74)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (4, 30, 8)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 4 and N(F) ≥ 8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (4, 7)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (83, 136, 66)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 68, 33)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 15 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (15, 32)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (15, 68, 33)-net over F4, using
- digital (4, 30, 8)-net over F2, using
(113, 166, 86)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive
(113, 166, 86)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (30, 83, 43)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- base expansion [i] based on digital (60, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (30, 42)-sequence in base 4, using
(113, 166, 132)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (113, 166, 132)-net over F2, using
(113, 166, 820)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (113, 166, 821)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (113, 165, 821)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 47 278210 916402 567974 876026 355344 991949 782149 673048 > 2165 [i]