Best Known (140, 169, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 169, 320)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 169, 320)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (139, 169, 320)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (139, 170, 320)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 34, 64)-net over F32, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F32 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 64, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (3, 63)-sequence over F32, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (3, 34, 64)-net over F32, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (139, 170, 320)-net over F2, using
(140, 169, 1024)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 169, 1024)-net over F2, using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2169, 1024, F2, 4, 29) (dual of [(1024, 4), 3927, 30]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(2169, 4096, F2, 29) (dual of [4096, 3927, 30]-code), using
- an extension Ce(28) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 212−1, defining interval I = [1,28], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 29 [i]
- OOA 4-folding [i] based on linear OA(2169, 4096, F2, 29) (dual of [4096, 3927, 30]-code), using
(140, 169, 24743)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 169, 24744)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 168, 24744)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 374 286065 424554 819810 872647 063342 129161 611224 234108 > 2168 [i]