Best Known (136, 175, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 175, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 175, 195)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 183, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 61, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 61, 65)-net over F8, using
(136, 175, 340)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 175, 340)-net over F2, using
(136, 175, 4501)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 175, 4502)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 174, 4502)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24023 051603 031743 677673 977972 972331 379044 907356 757474 > 2174 [i]